I've seen some weird statements that Herman Cain or Michele Bauchmann are "Tea Party darlings". See, I have a hard time processing how that can be because the whole Tea Party movement began with a money bomb for Ron Paul on the anniversary of the Boston Tea Party during the 2008 election. If you're a "Tea Partier" with a choice between Ron Paul & someone else, you choose Ron Paul. Period. But, because these two are getting some press, I'm going to take a little time & debunk them for you. 'Cause let me tell you, they can talk a good game, but their record shows that they are not what they pretend! Thomas E. Woods is a great historian, so this is an excellent place to begin your education. Don't take his word as Gospel, but use this as a jumping-off place. And, by all means, do not just rely on the media for your information . . . including "fair & unbiased" Fox News!
First up, learn about the trouble with Herman Cain:
As for Michele, you can read about her voting record here, which may be quite illuminating for those who believe her to be a "Constitutional Conservative".
And finally, watch below for a quick synopsis - meant for the Iowa voters heading to the straw poll, but more than applicable to the entire American constituency - of why Ron Paul is the most qualified man for the presidency:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment